Masconomet Logo

"The unexamined life is not worth living." Socrates

 

12 Angry Men


Home PageFreshman English Menu PageSophomore English Menu PageJunior English Menu PageSenior English Menu PageMenu Page for Archetypes and Motifs in Literature and CinemaMenu Page for MythologyMenu Page for ConnectionsMenu Page for MCAS InformationMenu Page for CompositionMenu Page for Information about Thomas Trevenen

Menu:

Cast and Credits


Number 1 - Foreman: Martin Balsom
Number 2: John Fieldler
Number 3: Lee J. Cobb
Number 4: E. G. Marshall
Number 6: Edward Binns
Number 7: Jack Warden
Number 8: Henry Fonda
Number 9: Joseph Sweeney
Number 10: Ed Begley
Number 11: George Voskovec
Number 12: Robert Webber

Directed by Sidney Lumet
Screenplay by Reginald Rose
 

Resources

Review for 12 Angry Men (1957) A Review by Steve Rhodes

Review by Steve Rhodes for Internet Movie Database. He gives it four out of four stars.

 Learning Guide to 12 Angry Men

Contains discussion questions and gives a review for the appropriateness for class use.

 12 Angry Men "Is-It-Worth-It" Guide

Reviews by Ms. Linda Holmes for Popcorn Lobby.com.

Notes

Twelve Angry Men is one of the great movies. It has tight, dramatic dialogue, interesting character exposition, excellent pacing and powerful acting by one of the best ensemble casts ever put together in the moives. But, the movie begins with a mistake. Within the first three minutes, before we get to the jury room, we see the courtroom where the bored, disinterested judge gives the jury its instructions. As the twelve men move into the deliberations room, one looks back at the defendent - and we see him. This is a mistake. First, because we should never see the defendent. The boy on trial should be a faceless unknown. It is a mistake in the second place because of the face Sidney Lumet attaches to the defendent. It is the face of a pathetic, mouse of a boy. The eyes of the boy are large and pleading to the jury as they leave the courtroom. It is the face the audience would want to be innocent. There should not be this prejudice on the part of the audience. It is a mistake.
 
 

E-mail Thomas Trevenen 


Copyright 2001-2002 by Thomas Trevenen

Number of visitors since January 8, 2001:

Back to Top